Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Ford F150 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 154 HP | 325 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 542 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 171 HP less power than Ford F150, whereas torque is 162 NM less than Ford F150. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 11.2 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford F150, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.23 m | 5.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.96 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 68 cm shorter than the Ford F150, 21 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | 1495 litres | |
|
Ford F150 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi L 200 has 434 litres less trunk space than the Ford F150. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 3`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 000 | 42 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Ford F150 has
| |