Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Toyota Hilux 2017
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 154 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 4 HP more power than Toyota Hilux, but torque is 20 NM less than Toyota Hilux. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
1070 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
820 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi L 200 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Toyota Hilux engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.23 m | 5.33 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 11 cm shorter than the Toyota Hilux, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 3`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 30 000 | 26 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |