Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2016
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 181 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 430 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 1 HP more power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volkswagen Amarok. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 8.3 | |
Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
960 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.23 m | 5.25 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.95 m | |
Height: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Amarok, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Amarok, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 3`040 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 30 000 | 34 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |