Mitsubishi L 200 2000 vs Nissan Navara 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 133 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 304 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 18 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 64 NM less than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
710 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 5.22 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.57 m | 1.77 m | |
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 72 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 20 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 13.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`830 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4600 | 10 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |