Mitsubishi L 200 2000 vs Ford Ranger 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 330 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 28 HP less power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.9 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
710 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 5.08 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.57 m | 1.75 m | |
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 58 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 18 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1500 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`830 | 3`070 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4600 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |