Mitsubishi L 200 1996 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 132 HP | 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 30 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 58 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 470'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 40 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Pajero, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi L 200 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 4 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`720 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |