Mitsubishi L 200 1996 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi L 200 1996) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi L 200 2006) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 1996 engine produces 41 HP less power than Mitsubishi L 200 2006, whereas torque is 160 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200 2006. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi L 200 1996 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 45 years | 30 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 1996 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi L 200 1996 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 1996 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 1996 is 58 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi L 200 2006, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 1996 is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |