Mitsubishi L 200 1996 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 4.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 95 HP less power than Chevrolet Blazer, whereas torque is 186 NM less than Chevrolet Blazer. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 68 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 45 years | 6 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi L 200 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 11 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Blazer, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1920 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |