Mitsubishi L 200 1996 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 65 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 133 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 90 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 33 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 25 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 29 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1700 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`835 | 2`810 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |