Mitsubishi L 200 1996 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 50 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 50 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 58 litres | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Pajero | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 14 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`835 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |