Mitsubishi L 200 1996 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1996

 
Mitsubishi L 200
1996 - 2006
Toyota Land Cruiser
1996 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel3.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 100 HP125 HP
Torque: 240 NM295 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds14.9 seconds
Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 25 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data11.1
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres90 litres
720 km with real consumption800 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Engine production duration: 30 years13 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mitsubishi PajeroUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.73 m
Width: 1.66 m1.73 m
Height: 1.57 m1.86 m
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller.
Mitsubishi L 200 is 23 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 29 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data742 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1150 litres
Turning diameter: no data11.4 meters
Gross weight: 2`835 kg2`680 kg
Net weight:1`730 kg1`885 kg
Load capacity:1`105 kg795 kg
Mitsubishi L 200 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Therefore, Mitsubishi L 200 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 44007000
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi L 200 has
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Toyota Land Cruiser has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv