Mitsubishi L 200 1996 vs Opel Antara 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 50 HP less power than Opel Antara, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Opel Antara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 65 litres | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Pajero | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Captiva, Chevrolet Epica, Chevrolet Cruze | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Opel Antara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 8 cm shorter than the Opel Antara, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1420 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`835 kg | 2`225 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`730 kg | 1`805 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`105 kg | 420 kg | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 62 procentiem more than Opel Antara. Therefore, Mitsubishi L 200 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Opel Antara has
| |