Mitsubishi L 200 1996 vs Nissan Terrano 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 16.7 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 25 HP less power than Nissan Terrano, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Nissan Terrano. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 72 litres | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 16 cm shorter than the Nissan Terrano, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 28 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 115 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1900 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`835 kg | 2`800 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`730 kg | 1`875 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`105 kg | 925 kg | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Nissan Terrano. Therefore, Mitsubishi L 200 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Nissan Terrano has
| |