Mitsubishi L 200 1996 vs Nissan Navara 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Double-row timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 304 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 33 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 64 NM less than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Pajero | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 5.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.77 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 72 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`835 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |