Mitsubishi L 200 1996 vs Mercedes ML 1999

 
Mitsubishi L 200
1996 - 2006
Mercedes ML
1999 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.7 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 100 HP163 HP
Torque: 240 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds11.6 seconds
Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 63 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 160 NM less than Mercedes ML.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data9.5
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres70 litres
720 km with real consumption660 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Engine production duration: 30 years8 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mitsubishi PajeroInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes G klase
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Mercedes ML engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.59 m
Width: 1.66 m1.83 m
Height: 1.57 m1.78 m
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller.
Mitsubishi L 200 is 9 cm shorter than the Mercedes ML, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 21 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: no data11.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`8353`365
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 48002400
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi L 200 has
  • timing belt engine
Mercedes ML has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv