Mitsubishi L 200 1996 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 36 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 11.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 90 litres | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Pajero | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 21 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 24 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 25 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`835 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |