Mitsubishi L 200 1996 vs Hyundai Terracan 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 345 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 63 HP less power than Hyundai Terracan, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Hyundai Terracan. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Pajero | Used also on Kia Carnival | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Terracan engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 21 cm shorter than the Hyundai Terracan, 21 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1955 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`835 | 2`620 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Hyundai Terracan has
| |