Mitsubishi L 200 1996 vs Chevrolet Tahoe 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 455 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 150 HP less power than Chevrolet Tahoe, whereas torque is 215 NM less than Chevrolet Tahoe. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 114 litres | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 240 mm (9.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Chevrolet Tahoe can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 5.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 56 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Tahoe, 29 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2815 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`835 | 2`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Chevrolet Tahoe has
| |