Mitsubishi L 200 2006 vs Audi Q7 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 168 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 402 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 72 HP less power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 148 NM less than Audi Q7. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 100 litres | |
| 930 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.74 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 775 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`910 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |