Mitsubishi L 200 2006 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 27 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 86 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 3 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is 47 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 2`506 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |