Mitsubishi L 200 2006 vs Isuzu D-Max 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 and Isuzu D-Max have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi L 200 torque is 34 NM more than Isuzu D-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Isuzu D-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Isuzu D-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.72 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is 5 cm longer than the Isuzu D-Max, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 2`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Isuzu D-Max has
| |