Mitsubishi L 200 2006 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 441 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 54 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 127 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 8.7 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Pajero engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 25 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.87 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is 18 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1790 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 2`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |