Mitsubishi L 200 2006 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 4 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 26 NM less than Volkswagen Amarok. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 7.7 | |
|
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 18 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Amarok, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 3`040 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |