Mitsubishi L 200 2006 vs Nissan Navara 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Double-row timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 38 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 89 NM less than Nissan Navara. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.2 | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Navara engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 15 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |