Mitsubishi L 200 2012 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 4 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 26 NM less than Volkswagen Amarok. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.8 | |
|
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 7 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Amarok, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Amarok, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`850 kg | 3`040 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`870 kg | 1`874 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 980 kg | 1`166 kg | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem less than Volkswagen Amarok. Therefore, Volkswagen Amarok is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |