Mitsubishi L 200 2012 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 4 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 26 NM less than Volkswagen Amarok. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.7 | |
|
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 7 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Amarok, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Amarok, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 3`040 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |