Mitsubishi L 200 2012 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2010

 
Mitsubishi L 200
2012 - 2015
Volkswagen Amarok
2010 - 2016
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 136 HP180 HP
Torque: 314 NM420 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15 seconds10.1 seconds
Volkswagen Amarok is a more dynamic driving.
Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 44 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 106 NM less than Volkswagen Amarok. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.38.0
Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 45 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway1080 km on highway
Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.19 m5.18 m
Width: 1.75 m1.94 m
Height: 1.78 m1.82 m
Mitsubishi L 200 and Volkswagen Amarok are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters13 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Amarok, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`850 kg3`040 kg
Net weight:1`870 kg1`894 kg
Load capacity:980 kg1`146 kg
Mitsubishi L 200 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Volkswagen Amarok. Therefore, Volkswagen Amarok is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 920016 600
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi L 200 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volkswagen Amarok has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv