Mitsubishi L 200 2012 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 44 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 106 NM less than Volkswagen Amarok. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 5.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 and Volkswagen Amarok are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Amarok, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`850 kg | 3`040 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`870 kg | 1`894 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 980 kg | 1`146 kg | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Volkswagen Amarok. Therefore, Volkswagen Amarok is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |