Mitsubishi L 200 2012 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 24 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, but torque is 14 NM more than Volkswagen Amarok. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 9.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 5.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 and Volkswagen Amarok are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Amarok, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 3`040 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 19 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |