Mitsubishi L 200 2012 vs Toyota Hilux 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 171 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Hilux is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 35 HP less power than Toyota Hilux, whereas torque is 46 NM less than Toyota Hilux. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.7 | |
|
The Toyota Hilux is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Hilux gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Hilux engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Toyota Land Cruiser | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota Hilux 2012 3.0 engine: The engine tends to be noisy and vibrate.
Nozzle life is limited when using poor quality fuel.
Increased oil consumption tends to occur over time. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 5.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 8 cm shorter than the Toyota Hilux, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 900 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Hilux, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 2`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |