Mitsubishi L 200 2012 vs Toyota Hilux 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota Hilux is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 14 HP less power than Toyota Hilux, whereas torque is 86 NM less than Toyota Hilux. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Hilux engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 10 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Hilux engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 5.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 15 cm shorter than the Toyota Hilux, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Hilux, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 3`210 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 20 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |