Mitsubishi L 200 2012 vs Mazda CX-9 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.7 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mitsubishi L 200) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mazda CX-9) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 273 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 367 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 137 HP less power than Mazda CX-9, whereas torque is 53 NM less than Mazda CX-9. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 12.9 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 4.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 690 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-9 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 8 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.73 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is 10 cm longer than the Mazda CX-9, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 487 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2852 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-9, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 2`062 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |