Mitsubishi L 200 2012 vs Isuzu D-Max 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Isuzu D-Max is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 27 HP less power than Isuzu D-Max, whereas torque is 86 NM less than Isuzu D-Max. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.3 | |
|
The Isuzu D-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 5.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 11 cm shorter than the Isuzu D-Max, 11 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Isuzu D-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Isuzu D-Max has
| |