Mitsubishi L 200 2012 vs Ford Ranger 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Ranger is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 7 HP less power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Ford Ranger. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.9 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is larger. Mitsubishi L 200 is 11 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 2`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |