Mitsubishi L 200 2012 vs Ford Ranger 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 375 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Ranger is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 14 HP less power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 61 NM less than Ford Ranger. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi L 200 is 17 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1450 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`850 kg | 3`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`870 kg | 1`946 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 980 kg | 1`254 kg | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem less than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |