Mitsubishi L 200 2012 vs Ford Explorer 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 345 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 485 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
|
Ford Explorer is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 209 HP less power than Ford Explorer, whereas torque is 171 NM less than Ford Explorer. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 8.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 12.3 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 600 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is 18 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 25 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 595 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |