Mitsubishi L 200 2012 vs Audi Q7 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
|
Audi Q7 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 136 HP less power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 286 NM less than Audi Q7. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 8.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 6.1 | |
|
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1570 km on highway | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 470'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi Q7 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Audi A4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Audi Q7 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is 18 cm longer than the Audi Q7, 22 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 770 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 770 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1955 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Audi Q7, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 2`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 31 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |