Mitsubishi L 200 2012 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2011

Mitsubishi L 200
2012 - 2015
Volkswagen Amarok
2011 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.0 Diesel


Power: 136 HP180 HP
Torque: 314 NM420 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17.8 seconds10.9 seconds
Volkswagen Amarok is a more dynamic driving.
Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 44 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 106 NM less than Volkswagen Amarok. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.78.0
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 105 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 860 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1140 km on highway
Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)


Length: 5.00 m5.25 m
Width: 1.80 m1.94 m
Height: 1.78 m1.83 m
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller.
Mitsubishi L 200 is 25 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Amarok, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters13 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Amarok, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`8502`820
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 10 80017 800
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi L 200 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volkswagen Amarok has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: