Mitsubishi L 200 2012 vs Ford Ranger 2011

Mitsubishi L 200
2012 - 2015
Ford Ranger
2011 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.2 Diesel


Power: 136 HP150 HP
Torque: 314 NM375 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17.8 seconds12.4 seconds
Ford Ranger is a more dynamic driving.
Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 14 HP less power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 61 NM less than Ford Ranger. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.79.4
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 860 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1000 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)


Length: 5.00 m5.36 m
Width: 1.80 m1.85 m
Height: 1.78 m1.71 m
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller, but higher.
Mitsubishi L 200 is 36 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data1450 litres
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters12.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`8503`200
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 11 20018 200
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi L 200 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Ford Ranger has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: