Mitsubishi L 200 2015 vs Nissan Navara 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 181 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 9 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Nissan Navara. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 600 mm (23.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Navara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.21 m | 5.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 10 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 3`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |