Mitsubishi L 200 2015 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2012

 
Mitsubishi L 200
2015 - 2018
Mitsubishi L 200
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Diesel2.5 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 181 HP136 HP
Torque: 430 NM314 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.8 seconds17.8 seconds
Mitsubishi L 200 2015 is more dynamic to drive.
Mitsubishi L 200 2015 engine produces 45 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200 2012, whereas torque is 116 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200 2012. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi L 200 2015 reaches 100 km/h speed 6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.58.7
The Mitsubishi L 200 2015 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi L 200 2015 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200 2012, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 2015 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
1110 km on highway1000 km on highway
Mitsubishi L 200 2015 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km300'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi L 200 2015 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 9 years30 years
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 2012 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 5.21 m5.00 m
Width: 1.82 m1.80 m
Height: 1.78 m1.78 m
Mitsubishi L 200 2015 is larger.
Mitsubishi L 200 2015 is 21 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200 2012, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`8502`850
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 18 40011 200
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi L 200 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Mitsubishi L 200 has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv