Mitsubishi L 200 2015 vs Ford Ranger 2015

 
Mitsubishi L 200
2015 - 2018
Ford Ranger
2015 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 181 HP160 HP
Torque: 430 NM385 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.8 seconds12.6 seconds
Mitsubishi L 200 is more dynamic to drive.
Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 21 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.58.0
Real fuel consumption: 10.8 l/100km9.6 l/100km
The Ford Ranger is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
1110 km on highway1140 km on highway
690 km with real consumption830 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.21 m5.36 m
Width: 1.82 m1.86 m
Height: 1.78 m1.80 m
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller.
Mitsubishi L 200 is 16 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.8 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`8503`200
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 18 40035 200
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi L 200 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv