Mitsubishi L 200 2015 vs Nissan Navara 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 154 HP | 190 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 450 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 36 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.0 | |
Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
1200 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.21 m | 5.30 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 10 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 3`010 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 14 400 | 18 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |