Mitsubishi L 200 2015 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 154 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 26 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Volkswagen Amarok. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.0 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 192 mm (7.6 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.21 m | 5.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Amarok, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`850 kg | 3`040 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`855 kg | 1`894 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 995 kg | 1`146 kg | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Volkswagen Amarok. Therefore, Volkswagen Amarok is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |