Mitsubishi L 200 2015 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 154 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 26 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volkswagen Amarok. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.6 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.21 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 5 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Amarok, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 3`040 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 34 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |