Mitsubishi L 200 2015 vs Nissan Navara 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 154 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 77 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 170 NM less than Nissan Navara. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan Navara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine: The V9X engine stands out due to its unusual 65-degree V-angle. It features a lightweight cast-iron block, aluminum cylinder heads with hydraulic lifters, a variable geometry turbocharger, and a chain-driven timing ... More about Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.21 m | 5.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 19 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.5 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 3`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |