Mitsubishi L 200 2015 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 154 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 314 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 15 seconds | |
Mitsubishi L 200 2015 is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi L 200 2015 engine produces 18 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200 2012, whereas torque is 66 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200 2012. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi L 200 2015 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.3 | |
The Mitsubishi L 200 2015 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 2015 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200 2012, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 2015 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
1200 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
Mitsubishi L 200 2015 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 300'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi L 200 2015 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 30 years | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 2012 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.21 m | 5.19 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi L 200 2015 is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200 2012, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 2`850 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 14 400 | 10 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |