Mitsubishi L 200 2015 vs Land Rover Discovery 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 154 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Discovery is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 104 HP less power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 220 NM less than Land Rover Discovery. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Discovery can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Discovery engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.21 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is 24 cm longer than the Land Rover Discovery, 29 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 258 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2406 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |