Mitsubishi L 200 2015 vs Isuzu D-Max 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 154 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 9 HP less power than Isuzu D-Max, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Isuzu D-Max. Despite less power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 235 mm (9.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Isuzu D-Max can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.21 m | 5.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 9 cm shorter than the Isuzu D-Max, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Isuzu D-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Isuzu D-Max has
| |