Mitsubishi L 200 2015 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 154 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 385 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Ranger is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 6 HP less power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Ford Ranger. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 237 mm (9.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.21 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 16 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`850 kg | 3`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`855 kg | 1`933 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 995 kg | 1`267 kg | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem less than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 29 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |