Mitsubishi L 200 2015 vs Ford Explorer 2015

 
Mitsubishi L 200
2015 - 2018
Ford Explorer
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Diesel3.5 Petrol
Diesel (Mitsubishi L 200) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Ford Explorer) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."

Performance

Power: 154 HP345 HP
Torque: 380 NM475 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds6.4 seconds
Ford Explorer is a more dynamic driving.
Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 191 HP less power than Ford Explorer, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Ford Explorer. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.112.3
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 5.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 780 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle560 km in combined cycle
1200 km on highway740 km on highway
Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.21 m5.02 m
Width: 1.79 m1.99 m
Height: 1.78 m1.79 m
Mitsubishi L 200 is 19 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data595 litres
Turning diameter: 11.8 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`850no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 13 20017 000
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi L 200 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Ford Explorer has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv